SJMC students: Any reactions to this week’s historic media events?

Photo Credit: SJMC graduate student Brian Ekdale

With major news organizations around the country covering the debate and protest concerning Governor Walker’s proposed “budget repair bill” — and its implications for public employees both at UW and around Wisconsin — I know that many SJMC courses have been treating this week’s news as a “teachable moment.”  For example, in J201, “Introduction to mass communication,” I scrapped my scheduled Wednesday lecture (on video games, no less) for a less-polished, more-tentative, just-in-time lecture on the recent history of protest in the Middle East, especially Egypt.  We discussed the ways that, especially in societies lacking many of the press and speech freedoms that we enjoy in the US, the use of “new media” tools like Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter worked together with the power of “old media” infrastructures of broadcast radio and television to combine into the oldest mass communication strategy of them all — getting lots of bodies in the same place at the same time — in bringing down a decades-old, single-party, authoritarian government.  Clearly the situation and the stakes are different here in Wisconsin this week.  But this is still an important moment to consider how media organizations, infrastructures, and strategies work (and fail) when members of a pluralistic, democratic, and open society must debate divisive political, economic, and cultural issues.  So in an attempt to energize our humble SJMC blog a bit, I invite all SJMC undergraduate and graduate students to respond to this post with their experiences and reactions, photos and ideas, concerning this week’s media and policy action.  (Asking questions is OK too.)  Just use the “comments” link under the title of this post.

Sometimes, teaching democracy means stepping back

Governor Walker’s budget repair bill is a topic about which few people have a neutral opinion. Of late, the most vocal are those who are opposed, and rallies have surrounded the Capitol with those traveling from across the state to show their support — “peaceably to assemble,” as the First Amendment of the US Constitution puts it.

This has, indeed, been a rich opportunity to for free expression. But none so interesting to me as what has been happening in the public high schools in our state.

On Monday, 100 students from Stoughton High School walked out of their classrooms to protest the impact the bill may have on their teachers and school. On Tuesday, hundreds of students from Madison East High School left their classrooms to make a two-mile walk to the Capitol. They were joined in spirit by high school students in Appleton, Platteville and Janesville. These students left their campuses, knowing full well the consequences they risked, to express their opinion regarding a crucial civic issue.

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court decision of 1969 found that it was not unconstitutional and did not offend the First Amendment to punish students for expression that “materially and substantially interfere[s] with the requirements of appropriate discipline in the operation of the school.” Surely, discipline is substantially interfered with when students defy their teachers and administrators by leaving the classroom during school hours to engage in expression — in some cases, just off of school property. The consequences for these young people are real, and the schools are within their rights to deliver them.

And yet, I can’t help but hope that schools take this opportunity to teach democracy by stepping back. While it’s likely some students opted to participate in these walkouts as an opportunity to miss school, a great many more participated because they found an issue that could not be ignored. They found within them words that need to be spoken, a voice that needed to be heard. When this has passed, who knows how many will retain that passion for involvement in civic affairs? How many will become regular and reliable voters? How many will dedicate their lives to public service to improve the lives of those around them?

Free speech has sparked in Stoughton, Madison, Appleton, Platteville, Janesville and likely many more schools. Left alone and unguided, a spark can either die out or rage out of control. Teachers and administrators can guide that spark into a steady fire of civic and political engagement. But for now, they just need to step back and let it begin to grow.

What happens when we lose state government reporting?

The upending of the traditional business model of journalism has brought many questions and concerns, but among them, this is one of my biggest fears: are we losing courageous reporting on state government.

I spent my reporting infancy in the arms of a ferocious state reporter named Neil Shively, of the Milwaukee Sentinel. Neil was so intent on protecting citizens’ interest in monitoring their representatives that he refused to accept the governor’s embargoed budget. He declined the advanced copy of the budget, saying he wouldn’t agree to not write about it until the governor’s appointed time. Instead, he set off on a mission to uncover the key elements of the budget without ever seeing the advance. He succeeded.

The lesson this intern learned: when reporters get too comfy with officials, they lose sight of the stories they are supposed to be covering.

Today, I’m left wondering who remains in the statehouse to do the stories Neil did. His own bureau contracted, as have the staffs of virtually every other media outlet in the state. State government has not similarly contracted. It’s not as if we are collecting fewer taxes, introducing fewer bills or regulating less behavior. Add the tremendous influence of money in governing today, and you have more — not less — need for reporting.

Check this snip from a great Nieman Reports piece:

As the digital revolution devastates and reshapes the news media, I fear what’s likely to be lost in the shuffle is a next generation of statehouse beat reporters who will follow in the footsteps of people like the Pulitzer Prize-winning Morgan, the Chicago Tribune’s Ray Long, Steve Walters of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, and George Skelton of the Los Angeles Times. With their institutional knowledge, gigantic Rolodexes, and unending determination to afflict the comfortable and hold the powerful to account, these four outstanding journalists and others like them have been an awesome force for good government.

via Nieman Reports | Statehouse Beat Woes Portend Bad News for Good Government.

The entire piece is worth reading. We are not going to recover the old business model. What can we do to ensure courageous reporting as a check on state government power? Is part of the solution educating the public about new efforts to disguise partisanship in the sheep’s clothing of new independent news outlets?

Panel to explore WikiLeaks 5:30 p.m. 2/10

The Center for the Humanities presents an upcoming panel on WikiLeaks at the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery on February 10 at 5:30.   Join Anne McClintock (English), Lew Friedland (Journalism and Mass Communication), and Rob Glenn Howard (Comm Arts) as they debate the tangled but fascinating skeins of WikiLeaks:  what governments choose to reveal and why; whether Julian Assange (as a media personality) has eclipsed the impact of the secret information he’s released; why Private Bradley Manning is being held without trial in solitary confinement at Quantico; how WikiLeaks is changing the way institutions manage information in the networked age; and much more.

Anne McClintock writes about military cover-ups and national paranoia.  Lew Friedland considers journalistic responsibility, and whether non-state actors gathering and caching secrets, and leaking them according to their own logic and purposes, can undermine efforts towards the peaceful resolution of disputes.  Rob Glenn Howard is an expert on the vernacular dispersed authority of the Internet.  Steve Paulson, executive producer of Wisconsin Public Radio’s To the Best of Our Knowledge, will moderate the panel.

2 undergrads win WNA scholarships

Congratulations to SJMC undergraduates Cailley Hammel and Allie Tempus, winners of the 2011 Wisconsin Newspaper Association Foundation Scholarship.

Cailley served most recently as editor of our Curb magazine, and Allie has extensive experience with the Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism and Corkboard, our online literary magazine.

Read the full release from the Wisconsin Newspaper Association.